Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 4310, 2021 02 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1096332

ABSTRACT

Patients requiring diagnostic testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are routinely assessed by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) amplification of Sars-CoV-2 virus RNA extracted from oro/nasopharyngeal swabs. Despite the good specificity of the assays certified for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection, and a theoretical sensitivity of few viral gene copies per reaction, a relatively high rate of false negatives continues to be reported. This is an important challenge in the management of patients on hospital admission and for correct monitoring of the infectivity after the acute phase. In the present report, we show that the use of digital PCR, a high sensitivity method to detect low amplicon numbers, allowed us to correctly detecting infection in swab material in a significant number of false negatives. We show that the implementation of digital PCR methods in the diagnostic assessment of COVID-19 could resolve, at least in part, this timely issue.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , False Negative Reactions , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/genetics , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL